Comments on: Using WCF for REST, Part 2 http://underground.infovark.com/2008/05/17/using-wcf-for-rest-part-2/ The Infovark technology blog Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:24:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Rinsing the SOAP from WCF (or, RESTful WCF Hyperlink Acupuncture) | The Freak Parade http://underground.infovark.com/2008/05/17/using-wcf-for-rest-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Rinsing the SOAP from WCF (or, RESTful WCF Hyperlink Acupuncture) | The Freak Parade Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:32:13 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=21#comment-74 [...] WCF for REST, Part 1, Part2 and Part 3. Make sure you read all the comments though, several of the gripes brought up in these [...] [...] WCF for REST, Part 1, Part2 and Part 3. Make sure you read all the comments though, several of the gripes brought up in these [...]

]]> By: Using WCF for REST, Part 3 « Infovark Underground http://underground.infovark.com/2008/05/17/using-wcf-for-rest-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29 Using WCF for REST, Part 3 « Infovark Underground Tue, 27 May 2008 15:44:55 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=21#comment-29 [...] easiest way to explain the issues we encountered when implementing REST is to work through the design principles we followed. I think much of our trouble came from the [...] [...] easiest way to explain the issues we encountered when implementing REST is to work through the design principles we followed. I think much of our trouble came from the [...]

]]> By: Dean http://underground.infovark.com/2008/05/17/using-wcf-for-rest-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25 Dean Wed, 21 May 2008 22:52:04 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=21#comment-25 Hey Steve, glad you stopped by. I've found <a href="hyperthink.net/blog" rel="nofollow">Brain.Save()</a> very useful for getting a handle on this WCF stuff. I started writing an explanation of #4, but it was too long for a comment. I'll get a post up soon about our REST design. Hey Steve, glad you stopped by. I’ve found Brain.Save() very useful for getting a handle on this WCF stuff.

I started writing an explanation of #4, but it was too long for a comment. I’ll get a post up soon about our REST design.

]]> By: Steve Maine http://underground.infovark.com/2008/05/17/using-wcf-for-rest-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Steve Maine Sun, 18 May 2008 05:16:22 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=21#comment-22 Thanks for posting this! I'm looking forward to reading more about your experiences as they all sound like good issues. I'm interested in all of them, but (4) is the one that piques my curiosity the most. What kind of factoring patterns would you like to be able to do, but can't? To what degree does the single-implementation-type-per-service restriction play in here? -smaine Thanks for posting this! I’m looking forward to reading more about your experiences as they all sound like good issues.

I’m interested in all of them, but (4) is the one that piques my curiosity the most. What kind of factoring patterns would you like to be able to do, but can’t? To what degree does the single-implementation-type-per-service restriction play in here?
-smaine

]]>