<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WCF WebInvoke Body Format Error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://underground.infovark.com/2009/03/08/wcf-webinvoke-body-format-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/03/08/wcf-webinvoke-body-format-error/</link>
	<description>The Infovark technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/03/08/wcf-webinvoke-body-format-error/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=359#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Hey Brad,

It&#039;s a long explanation, so I appended my answer to the post above. The short version is: I took the XmlElement route because I could change fewer lines of code. I didn&#039;t have to create a new WebContentTypeMapper-derived class and figure out where to plug it in.

What do you think? An ugly hack?
Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brad,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a long explanation, so I appended my answer to the post above. The short version is: I took the XmlElement route because I could change fewer lines of code. I didn&#8217;t have to create a new WebContentTypeMapper-derived class and figure out where to plug it in.</p>
<p>What do you think? An ugly hack?<br />
Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/03/08/wcf-webinvoke-body-format-error/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=359#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Hey Dean,

I&#039;m running into this same error and am wondering why you went the XmlElement way instead of getting WCF to treat the request as Raw?  

By the way, did this error come about if you only had one WebInvoke on the service, or only after you added multiple WebInvokes?

Thanks,
Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dean,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running into this same error and am wondering why you went the XmlElement way instead of getting WCF to treat the request as Raw?  </p>
<p>By the way, did this error come about if you only had one WebInvoke on the service, or only after you added multiple WebInvokes?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

