<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual Studio 2008 and the CopyLocal setting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/</link>
	<description>The Infovark technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: woolie</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-3324</link>
		<dc:creator>woolie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-3324</guid>
		<description>yep, the CopyLocal bug is still there (comfortably) in VS2010.
just another microsoft screwup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, the CopyLocal bug is still there (comfortably) in VS2010.<br />
just another microsoft screwup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 500 and Other Errors in Azure Deployments - Jim O&#039;Neil - Developer Evangelist - Site Home - MSDN Blogs</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-2034</link>
		<dc:creator>500 and Other Errors in Azure Deployments - Jim O&#039;Neil - Developer Evangelist - Site Home - MSDN Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 01:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-2034</guid>
		<description>[...] Bottom line, Copy Local looks like a boolean value in the IDE, but it is really a ternary value under the covers.&#160; Without an explicit &lt;private&gt; tag Visual Studio is supposed to do the right thing, but it seems that&#8217;s not the case for all.&#160; You can read more about this behavior in Jeremy Jameson&#8217;s blog and Infovark. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bottom line, Copy Local looks like a boolean value in the IDE, but it is really a ternary value under the covers.&nbsp; Without an explicit &lt;private&gt; tag Visual Studio is supposed to do the right thing, but it seems that&rsquo;s not the case for all.&nbsp; You can read more about this behavior in Jeremy Jameson&rsquo;s blog and Infovark. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Ralph</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>Thanks for documenting this horrible muddle. Your post has helped me fixed an issue I&#039;ve been having.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for documenting this horrible muddle. Your post has helped me fixed an issue I&#8217;ve been having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin James</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-1956</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-1956</guid>
		<description>I can confirm that this issue exists in VS 2010 SP1 as well...

J.Ja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm that this issue exists in VS 2010 SP1 as well&#8230;</p>
<p>J.Ja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 &#171; Romiko Derbynew&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 &#171; Romiko Derbynew&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-633</guid>
		<description>[...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/" rel="nofollow">http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barrow</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-632</guid>
		<description>And the problem is more complicated with test projects, because then you have the testrunconfig&#039;s deployment section to think about too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the problem is more complicated with test projects, because then you have the testrunconfig&#8217;s deployment section to think about too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barrow</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-631</guid>
		<description>@mota Make sure you have a hard reference to project1 in project2 (i.e. there is a piece of code that uses something from project1 - not just a using statement as far as I know, actual calling code).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mota Make sure you have a hard reference to project1 in project2 (i.e. there is a piece of code that uses something from project1 &#8211; not just a using statement as far as I know, actual calling code).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mota</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>mota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 09:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-580</guid>
		<description>same in vs2010, referencing dlls in project1, enforcing copy local as described in this article, and when i run project2 with reference to project1, nothing is there, not even in gac, just exception all over screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same in vs2010, referencing dlls in project1, enforcing copy local as described in this article, and when i run project2 with reference to project1, nothing is there, not even in gac, just exception all over screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 - Romiko&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 - Romiko&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/" rel="nofollow">http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florence</title>
		<link>http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Florence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-285</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s really bad and explains a lot of the weirdness i have witnessed with VS 2008.  Another thing is that VS really should let you specify what the default should be (in the VS options).  if you build your apps in such a way that they require copy local to be false 90% of the time, it&#039;s a real pain to having to change the setting every time.

~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s really bad and explains a lot of the weirdness i have witnessed with VS 2008.  Another thing is that VS really should let you specify what the default should be (in the VS options).  if you build your apps in such a way that they require copy local to be false 90% of the time, it&#8217;s a real pain to having to change the setting every time.</p>
<p>~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

