Comments on: Visual Studio 2008 and the CopyLocal setting http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ The Infovark technology blog Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:07:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 « Romiko Derbynew's Blog http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-633 Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 « Romiko Derbynew's Blog Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:12:44 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-633 [...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...] [...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...]

]]> By: James Barrow http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-632 James Barrow Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:00:47 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-632 And the problem is more complicated with test projects, because then you have the testrunconfig's deployment section to think about too. And the problem is more complicated with test projects, because then you have the testrunconfig’s deployment section to think about too.

]]> By: James Barrow http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-631 James Barrow Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:59:41 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-631 @mota Make sure you have a hard reference to project1 in project2 (i.e. there is a piece of code that uses something from project1 - not just a using statement as far as I know, actual calling code). @mota Make sure you have a hard reference to project1 in project2 (i.e. there is a piece of code that uses something from project1 – not just a using statement as far as I know, actual calling code).

]]> By: mota http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-580 mota Tue, 18 May 2010 09:49:48 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-580 same in vs2010, referencing dlls in project1, enforcing copy local as described in this article, and when i run project2 with reference to project1, nothing is there, not even in gac, just exception all over screen same in vs2010, referencing dlls in project1, enforcing copy local as described in this article, and when i run project2 with reference to project1, nothing is there, not even in gac, just exception all over screen

]]> By: Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 - Romiko's Blog http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-332 Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 - Romiko's Blog Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:14:01 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-332 [...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...] [...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...]

]]> By: Florence http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-285 Florence Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:10:17 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-285 that's really bad and explains a lot of the weirdness i have witnessed with VS 2008. Another thing is that VS really should let you specify what the default should be (in the VS options). if you build your apps in such a way that they require copy local to be false 90% of the time, it's a real pain to having to change the setting every time. ~ that’s really bad and explains a lot of the weirdness i have witnessed with VS 2008. Another thing is that VS really should let you specify what the default should be (in the VS options). if you build your apps in such a way that they require copy local to be false 90% of the time, it’s a real pain to having to change the setting every time.

~

]]> By: Chris http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/comment-page-1/#comment-238 Chris Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:05:32 +0000 http://underground.infovark.com/?p=447#comment-238 That's not all. If you do a project-to-project reference it ignores your setting altogether. I've recently updated my solution to include many projects whom's assemblies live in GAC. Then since they were there I made them project references and changed Copy Local to false. It decided to ignore me and GAC and start copying the assemblies to the projects local folder. That’s not all. If you do a project-to-project reference it ignores your setting altogether. I’ve recently updated my solution to include many projects whom’s assemblies live in GAC. Then since they were there I made them project references and changed Copy Local to false. It decided to ignore me and GAC and start copying the assemblies to the projects local folder.

]]>