Comments for Infovark Underground

Comment on ISO Date Validation RegEx by Cameron Brooks

Cameron Brooks — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:24:24 +0000

Hey guys. You’re quite correct that my regex didn’t account for fractional time elements. At the time I wrote it I didn’t require it for my application, and I didn’t realize how many people used them for super-precise ISO times. I’ve updated my regex to account for this.

Here are some strings that should match as valid:

2010-02-18T16:23:48.5
2010-02-18T16:23:48,444
2010-02-18T16:23:48,3-06:00
2010-02-18T16:23.4
2010-02-18T16:23,25
2010-02-18T16:23.33+0600
2010-02-18T16.23334444
2010-02-18T16,2283
2009-05-19 143922.500
2009-05-19 1439,55

And here are some strings that should not match as valid:

2009-05-19 146922.500
2010-02-18T16.5:23.35:48
2010-02-18T16:23.35:48
2010-02-18T16:23.35:48.45
2009-05-19 14.5.44
2010-02-18T16:23.33.600
2010-02-18T16,25:23:48,444

Here’s the updated regex that I was able to come up with:

^([\+-]?\d{4}(?!\d{2}\b))((-?)((0[1-9]|1[0-2])(\3([12]\d|0[1-9]|3[01]))?|W([0-4]\d|5[0-2])(-?[1-7])?|(00[1-9]|0[1-9]\d|[12]\d{2}|3([0-5]\d|6[1-6])))([T\s]((([01]\d|2[0-3])((:?)[0-5]\d)?|24\:?00)([\.,]\d+(?!:))?)?(\17[0-5]\d([\.,]\d+)?)?([zZ]|([\+-])([01]\d|2[0-3]):?([0-5]\d)?)?)?)?$

It still doesn’t account for the duration or time interval part of the ISO 8601 spec, so I guess that’ll have to come at a later date.

Lemme know if you find any bugs.

Comment on Visual Studio 2008 and the CopyLocal setting by Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 - Romiko's Blog

Upgrading BizTalk 2006 to BizTalk 2009 - Romiko's Blog — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:14:01 +0000

[...] http://underground.infovark.com/2009/09/09/visual-studio-2008-and-the-copylocal-setting/ [...]

Comment on ISO Date Validation RegEx by Bryan

Bryan — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:37:10 +0000

Cameron Brooks’ solution doesn’t seem to handle fractional sections, FWIW. Other than that it seems to work pretty well.

Comment on Using Spark View Engine with C# WebServer by Introducing the SparkServer Project « Infovark Underground

Introducing the SparkServer Project « Infovark Underground — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:27:22 +0000

[...] less than two weeks since I began my experiment using the Spark View Engine with C# WebServer. Even though it’s put a kink in our development schedule, I’m confident it was the [...]

Comment on Calling a Static Method from an Object Instance in C# by Dean

Dean — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:10:38 +0000

Nayak, the article you linked to makes the same point I was making in my comment. Using Invoke() to call a static method won’t give you the expected polymorphic behavior. It will always call the static method on the base class.

Comment on Calling a Static Method from an Object Instance in C# by Dean

Dean — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:06:23 +0000

Dutt, there’s a good example on using delegates to call static methods in C# on MSDN. Check out Microsoft’s delegates tutorial: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288459%28VS.71%29.aspx

Comment on Calling a Static Method from an Object Instance in C# by nayak

nayak — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:03:00 +0000

short & good explanation, but seems it is controdicting the what says in below articles. just sharing the link incase uses feel useful.

Can static methods be called using object/instance in .NET

http://msdotnetsupport.blogspot.com/2009/12/static-methods-calling-using-object-c.html

Comment on Calling a Static Method from an Object Instance in C# by Dutt

Dutt — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:43:06 +0000

Thanks for this. very nice one.

can you also please provide a sample on using delegates to static methods using object.

Thanks, Dutt

Comment on Looking for an IIS Alternative by Using Spark View Engine with C# WebServer « Infovark Underground

Using Spark View Engine with C# WebServer « Infovark Underground — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:40:31 +0000

[...] mentioned that we were looking for an IIS alternative that we could embed within our Infovark client [...]

Comment on Looking for an IIS Alternative by Dean

Dean — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:53:23 +0000

Hey Simon, send your code to us! It’ll save us having to start from scratch.